FREQUENCIES

building
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
2000 chestnut 1 33 45.83 46.48 46.48
2020 chestnut 2 38 52.78 53.52 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
building
N Valid 71
Missing 1
Mode 2.00
Chart: building
status
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
owner 1 65 90.28 95.59 95.59
renter 2 3 4.17 4.41 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
status
N Valid 68
Missing 4
Mode 1.00
Chart: status
how long
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
less than 5 years 1 22 30.56 31.88 31.88
less than 10 years 2 17 23.61 24.64 56.52
less than 20 years 3 15 20.83 21.74 78.26
more than 20 years 4 15 20.83 21.74 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
how long
N Valid 69
Missing 3
Mode 1.00
Chart: how long
landscaping
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 9 12.50 12.86 12.86
average 2 24 33.33 34.29 47.14
above average 3 25 34.72 35.71 82.86
excellent 4 12 16.67 17.14 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
landscaping
N Valid 70
Missing 2
Mode 3.00
Chart: landscaping
exteriors of buildings
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 4 5.56 5.80 5.80
average 2 27 37.50 39.13 44.93
above average 3 26 36.11 37.68 82.61
excellent 4 12 16.67 17.39 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
exteriors of buildings
N Valid 69
Missing 3
Mode 2.00
Chart: exteriors of buildings
interiors of buildings
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 1 1.39 1.43 1.43
average 2 20 27.78 28.57 30.00
above average 3 26 36.11 37.14 67.14
excellent 4 23 31.94 32.86 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
interiors of buildings
N Valid 70
Missing 2
Mode 3.00
Chart: interiors of buildings
fire lane
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 8 11.11 14.29 14.29
average 2 25 34.72 44.64 58.93
above average 3 11 15.28 19.64 78.57
excellent 4 12 16.67 21.43 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
no opinion 9 12 16.67 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
fire lane
N Valid 56
Missing 16
Mode 2.00
Chart: fire lane
gazebo
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 10 13.89 16.67 16.67
average 2 31 43.06 51.67 68.33
above average 3 10 13.89 16.67 85.00
excellent 4 9 12.50 15.00 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
no opinion 9 9 12.50 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
gazebo
N Valid 60
Missing 12
Mode 2.00
Chart: gazebo
board overall
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 3.64 3.64
average 2 19 26.39 34.55 38.18
above average 3 22 30.56 40.00 78.18
excellent 4 12 16.67 21.82 100.00
. 7 9.72 Missing
no opinion 9 10 13.89 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
board overall
N Valid 55
Missing 17
Mode 3.00
Chart: board overall
board knowledge
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 3 4.17 5.08 5.08
average 2 22 30.56 37.29 42.37
above average 3 22 30.56 37.29 79.66
excellent 4 12 16.67 20.34 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
no opinion 9 11 15.28 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
board knowledge
N Valid 59
Missing 13
Mode .
Chart: board knowledge
board communication
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 9 12.50 14.75 14.75
average 2 21 29.17 34.43 49.18
above average 3 14 19.44 22.95 72.13
excellent 4 17 23.61 27.87 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
no opinion 9 8 11.11 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
board communication
N Valid 61
Missing 11
Mode 2.00
Chart: board communication
board responsiveness
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 4 5.56 7.27 7.27
average 2 23 31.94 41.82 49.09
above average 3 15 20.83 27.27 76.36
excellent 4 13 18.06 23.64 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
no opinion 9 14 19.44 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
board responsiveness
N Valid 55
Missing 17
Mode 2.00
Chart: board responsiveness
board accessibility
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 3.33 3.33
average 2 23 31.94 38.33 41.67
above average 3 17 23.61 28.33 70.00
excellent 4 18 25.00 30.00 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
no opinion 9 9 12.50 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
board accessibility
N Valid 60
Missing 12
Mode 2.00
Chart: board accessibility
braeside overall
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 3.03 3.03
average 2 23 31.94 34.85 37.88
above average 3 19 26.39 28.79 66.67
excellent 4 22 30.56 33.33 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
no opinion 9 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
braeside overall
N Valid 66
Missing 6
Mode 2.00
Chart: braeside overall
braeside knowledge
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 3 4.17 4.62 4.62
average 2 16 22.22 24.62 29.23
above average 3 18 25.00 27.69 56.92
excellent 4 28 38.89 43.08 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
no opinion 9 5 6.94 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
braeside knowledge
N Valid 65
Missing 7
Mode 4.00
Chart: braeside knowledge
braeside communication
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 5 6.94 7.35 7.35
average 2 16 22.22 23.53 30.88
above average 3 20 27.78 29.41 60.29
excellent 4 27 37.50 39.71 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
no opinion 9 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
braeside communication
N Valid 68
Missing 4
Mode 4.00
Chart: braeside communication
braeside responsiveness
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 3 4.17 4.41 4.41
average 2 21 29.17 30.88 35.29
above average 3 14 19.44 20.59 55.88
excellent 4 30 41.67 44.12 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
no opinion 9 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
braeside responsiveness
N Valid 68
Missing 4
Mode 4.00
Chart: braeside responsiveness
braeside accessibility
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 4 5.56 5.88 5.88
average 2 16 22.22 23.53 29.41
above average 3 20 27.78 29.41 58.82
excellent 4 28 38.89 41.18 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
no opinion 9 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
braeside accessibility
N Valid 68
Missing 4
Mode 4.00
Chart: braeside accessibility
braeside review
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
yes 1 48 66.67 80.00 80.00
no 2 12 16.67 20.00 100.00
. 12 16.67 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
braeside review
N Valid 60
Missing 12
Mode 1.00
Chart: braeside review
apex overall
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 10 13.89 14.93 14.93
average 2 28 38.89 41.79 56.72
above average 3 19 26.39 28.36 85.07
excellent 4 10 13.89 14.93 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
no opinion 9 4 5.56 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
apex overall
N Valid 67
Missing 5
Mode 2.00
Chart: apex overall
apex chestnut
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 11 15.28 16.18 16.18
average 2 29 40.28 42.65 58.82
above average 3 18 25.00 26.47 85.29
excellent 4 10 13.89 14.71 100.00
no opinion 9 4 5.56 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
apex chestnut
N Valid 68
Missing 4
Mode 2.00
Chart: apex chestnut
apex front entrances
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 6 8.33 9.23 9.23
average 2 27 37.50 41.54 50.77
above average 3 21 29.17 32.31 83.08
excellent 4 11 15.28 16.92 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
no opinion 9 5 6.94 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
apex front entrances
N Valid 65
Missing 7
Mode 2.00
Chart: apex front entrances
apex shrubbery (north)
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 12 16.67 22.22 22.22
average 2 25 34.72 46.30 68.52
above average 3 12 16.67 22.22 90.74
excellent 4 5 6.94 9.26 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
no opinion 9 17 23.61 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
apex shrubbery (north)
N Valid 54
Missing 18
Mode 2.00
Chart: apex shrubbery (north)
apex shrubbery (south)
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 8 11.11 15.09 15.09
average 2 23 31.94 43.40 58.49
above average 3 17 23.61 32.08 90.57
excellent 4 5 6.94 9.43 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
no opinion 9 16 22.22 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
apex shrubbery (south)
N Valid 53
Missing 19
Mode 2.00
Chart: apex shrubbery (south)
apex lawn care
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 6 8.33 9.09 9.09
average 2 30 41.67 45.45 54.55
above average 3 18 25.00 27.27 81.82
excellent 4 12 16.67 18.18 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
no opinion 9 5 6.94 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
apex lawn care
N Valid 66
Missing 6
Mode 2.00
Chart: apex lawn care
apex tree care
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 8 11.11 13.79 13.79
average 2 26 36.11 44.83 58.62
above average 3 16 22.22 27.59 86.21
excellent 4 8 11.11 13.79 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
no opinion 9 13 18.06 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
apex tree care
N Valid 58
Missing 14
Mode 2.00
Chart: apex tree care
erels overall
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 1 1.39 1.61 1.61
average 2 20 27.78 32.26 33.87
above average 3 22 30.56 35.48 69.35
excellent 4 19 26.39 30.65 100.00
. 8 11.11 Missing
no opinion 9 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels overall
N Valid 62
Missing 10
Mode 3.00
Chart: erels overall
erels entrances/lobbies
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 2.90 2.90
average 2 20 27.78 28.99 31.88
above average 3 27 37.50 39.13 71.01
excellent 4 20 27.78 28.99 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
no opinion 9 2 2.78 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels entrances/lobbies
N Valid 69
Missing 3
Mode 3.00
Chart: erels entrances/lobbies
erels garage lobbies
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 2.94 2.94
average 2 26 36.11 38.24 41.18
above average 3 21 29.17 30.88 72.06
excellent 4 19 26.39 27.94 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
no opinion 9 3 4.17 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels garage lobbies
N Valid 68
Missing 4
Mode 2.00
Chart: erels garage lobbies
erels hallways/vacuuming
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 2.99 2.99
average 2 22 30.56 32.84 35.82
above average 3 26 36.11 38.81 74.63
excellent 4 17 23.61 25.37 100.00
. 2 2.78 Missing
no opinion 9 3 4.17 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels hallways/vacuuming
N Valid 67
Missing 5
Mode 3.00
Chart: erels hallways/vacuuming
erels exercise room
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
average 2 8 11.11 29.63 29.63
above average 3 13 18.06 48.15 77.78
excellent 4 6 8.33 22.22 100.00
. 5 6.94 Missing
no opinion 9 40 55.56 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels exercise room
N Valid 27
Missing 45
Mode 3.00
Chart: erels exercise room
erels social room
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
average 2 7 9.72 33.33 33.33
above average 3 11 15.28 52.38 85.71
excellent 4 3 4.17 14.29 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
no opinion 9 47 65.28 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels social room
N Valid 21
Missing 51
Mode 3.00
Chart: erels social room
erels kitchen stairwells
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 1 1.39 2.17 2.17
average 2 20 27.78 43.48 45.65
above average 3 14 19.44 30.43 76.09
excellent 4 11 15.28 23.91 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
no opinion 9 22 30.56 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels kitchen stairwells
N Valid 46
Missing 26
Mode 2.00
Chart: erels kitchen stairwells
erels public stairwells
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 3 4.17 5.77 5.77
average 2 21 29.17 40.38 46.15
above average 3 12 16.67 23.08 69.23
excellent 4 16 22.22 30.77 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
no opinion 9 17 23.61 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
erels public stairwells
N Valid 52
Missing 20
Mode 2.00
Chart: erels public stairwells
groot overall
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 3.70 3.70
average 2 24 33.33 44.44 48.15
above average 3 19 26.39 35.19 83.33
excellent 4 9 12.50 16.67 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
no opinion 9 15 20.83 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
groot overall
N Valid 54
Missing 18
Mode 2.00
Chart: groot overall
groot as scheduled
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 2 2.78 4.26 4.26
average 2 28 38.89 59.57 63.83
above average 3 8 11.11 17.02 80.85
excellent 4 9 12.50 19.15 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
no opinion 9 21 29.17 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
groot as scheduled
N Valid 47
Missing 25
Mode 2.00
Chart: groot as scheduled
groot disruption
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 1 1.39 2.38 2.38
average 2 22 30.56 52.38 54.76
above average 3 8 11.11 19.05 73.81
excellent 4 11 15.28 26.19 100.00
. 6 8.33 Missing
no opinion 9 24 33.33 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
groot disruption
N Valid 42
Missing 30
Mode 2.00
Chart: groot disruption
groot damage
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
unacceptable 1 1 1.39 3.03 3.03
average 2 19 26.39 57.58 60.61
above average 3 4 5.56 12.12 72.73
excellent 4 9 12.50 27.27 100.00
. 6 8.33 Missing
no opinion 9 33 45.83 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
groot damage
N Valid 33
Missing 39
Mode 2.00
Chart: groot damage
announcements (mail room)
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 21 29.17 29.58 29.58
often 2 26 36.11 36.62 66.20
quite often 3 24 33.33 33.80 100.00
. 1 1.39 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
announcements (mail room)
N Valid 71
Missing 1
Mode 2.00
Chart: announcements (mail room)
bulletin boards (garage)
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 13 18.06 18.06 18.06
often 2 29 40.28 40.28 58.33
quite often 3 30 41.67 41.67 100.00
Total 72 100.0 100.0
bulletin boards (garage)
N Valid 72
Missing 0
Mode 3.00
Chart: bulletin boards (garage)
web site
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 32 44.44 48.48 48.48
often 2 25 34.72 37.88 86.36
quite often 3 9 12.50 13.64 100.00
. 6 8.33 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
web site
N Valid 66
Missing 6
Mode 1.00
Chart: web site
exercise room
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 51 70.83 76.12 76.12
often 2 8 11.11 11.94 88.06
quite often 3 8 11.11 11.94 100.00
. 5 6.94 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
exercise room
N Valid 67
Missing 5
Mode 1.00
Chart: exercise room
social room
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 57 79.17 86.36 86.36
often 2 9 12.50 13.64 100.00
. 6 8.33 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
social room
N Valid 66
Missing 6
Mode 1.00
Chart: social room
gazebo
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 52 72.22 78.79 78.79
often 2 13 18.06 19.70 98.48
quite often 3 1 1.39 1.52 100.00
. 6 8.33 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
gazebo
N Valid 66
Missing 6
Mode 1.00
Chart: gazebo
clubhouse (rental)
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 59 81.94 92.19 92.19
often 2 5 6.94 7.81 100.00
. 8 11.11 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
clubhouse (rental)
N Valid 64
Missing 8
Mode 1.00
Chart: clubhouse (rental)
swimming pool
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 38 52.78 55.07 55.07
often 2 17 23.61 24.64 79.71
quite often 3 14 19.44 20.29 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
swimming pool
N Valid 69
Missing 3
Mode 1.00
Chart: swimming pool
tennis court
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 62 86.11 92.54 92.54
often 2 2 2.78 2.99 95.52
quite often 3 3 4.17 4.48 100.00
. 5 6.94 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
tennis court
N Valid 67
Missing 5
Mode 1.00
Chart: tennis court
bocce ball
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 60 83.33 93.75 93.75
often 2 4 5.56 6.25 100.00
. 8 11.11 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
bocce ball
N Valid 64
Missing 8
Mode 1.00
Chart: bocce ball
bean bag toss
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 58 80.56 90.63 90.63
often 2 6 8.33 9.38 100.00
. 8 11.11 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
bean bag toss
N Valid 64
Missing 8
Mode 1.00
Chart: bean bag toss
outdoor grills
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
seldom 1 52 72.22 81.25 81.25
often 2 9 12.50 14.06 95.31
quite often 3 3 4.17 4.69 100.00
. 8 11.11 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
outdoor grills
N Valid 64
Missing 8
Mode 1.00
Chart: outdoor grills
security front entrance
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
excellent 1 10 13.89 14.49 14.49
adequate 2 43 59.72 62.32 76.81
substandard 3 12 16.67 17.39 94.20
unsafe 4 4 5.56 5.80 100.00
. 3 4.17 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
security front entrance
N Valid 69
Missing 3
Mode 2.00
Chart: security front entrance
security general hallways
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
excellent 1 10 13.89 15.15 15.15
adequate 2 48 66.67 72.73 87.88
substandard 3 6 8.33 9.09 96.97
unsafe 4 2 2.78 3.03 100.00
. 6 8.33 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
security general hallways
N Valid 66
Missing 6
Mode 2.00
Chart: security general hallways
security general stairwells
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
excellent 1 7 9.72 10.77 10.77
adequate 2 46 63.89 70.77 81.54
substandard 3 8 11.11 12.31 93.85
unsafe 4 4 5.56 6.15 100.00
. 7 9.72 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
security general stairwells
N Valid 65
Missing 7
Mode 2.00
Chart: security general stairwells
security kitchen stairwells
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
excellent 1 8 11.11 12.31 12.31
adequate 2 45 62.50 69.23 81.54
substandard 3 8 11.11 12.31 93.85
unsafe 4 4 5.56 6.15 100.00
. 7 9.72 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
security kitchen stairwells
N Valid 65
Missing 7
Mode 2.00
Chart: security kitchen stairwells
security garage doors
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
excellent 1 5 6.94 7.35 7.35
adequate 2 40 55.56 58.82 66.18
substandard 3 15 20.83 22.06 88.24
unsafe 4 8 11.11 11.76 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
security garage doors
N Valid 68
Missing 4
Mode 2.00
Chart: security garage doors
security garage lobby
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
excellent 1 6 8.33 9.09 9.09
adequate 2 40 55.56 60.61 69.70
substandard 3 14 19.44 21.21 90.91
unsafe 4 6 8.33 9.09 100.00
. 6 8.33 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
security garage lobby
N Valid 66
Missing 6
Mode 2.00
Chart: security garage lobby
security in unit
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cum Percent
yes 1 2 2.78 3.17 3.17
no 2 61 84.72 96.83 100.00
. 4 5.56 Missing
no opinion 9 5 6.94 Missing
Total 72 100.0 100.0
security in unit
N Valid 63
Missing 9
Mode 2.00
Chart: security in unit